Published in the "The Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming"

• https://doi.org/10.22152/programming-journal.org/2020/4/14

• A copy of JHotDraw 5.1 is available as part of Dirk Riehle's dissertation:
  https://riehle.org/computer-science/research/dissertation/appendix-e.html

• The list of potential violations and the decision about whether they are true, is here:
  prog2020_study_data.xlsx (last update: 19-02-2020)
  prog2020_study_data_reductions.xlsx (Calculation of Table 1. Should be merged into first file.)

• Short video presentation at the <Programming> 2021 conference, (slides)

• An earlier version of this page contained a supplement. This has been mostly integrated as appendix into paper.

• On the first submission the subtitle had been “An exploratory deep dive into the nature of false positives of bad code smells”. The term “exploratory” comes from “exploratory case study” but does not fit too well into the metaphor of a “deep dive”. As suggested by a reviewer the title becomes simpler and more consistent by leaving “exploratory” aside. The correct subtitle is thus “A deep dive into the nature of false positives of bad code smells”. Unfortunately the old subtitle made it out into the wild, so there might be pages refering to the paper by the old subtitle.